tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-69735653659693664052024-03-13T08:17:21.396-07:00Network MusingsTransportation Internet Innovation Climate ChangeAnonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02127609476881611549noreply@blogger.comBlogger119125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6973565365969366405.post-74971174425155799422013-02-21T02:25:00.001-08:002013-02-21T02:25:19.840-08:00<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-YeuDDfGGPmo/USX2ALc0v-I/AAAAAAAAECk/tDJd3yHzJkE/s1600/February+099.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="240" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-YeuDDfGGPmo/USX2ALc0v-I/AAAAAAAAECk/tDJd3yHzJkE/s320/February+099.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #555555; font-family: 'PT Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 1.6; margin-bottom: 2.4rem; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="font-size: 14px; line-height: 1.6;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #555555; font-family: 'PT Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 1.6; margin-bottom: 2.4rem; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="font-size: 14px; line-height: 1.6;">The extra-ordinary snowstorm Nemo gave us a weekend out of the ordinary. Some of it was awful, and some of it was just great. So I thought about the good and the bad, and tried to sort it out. <a href="http://bostonstreets.org/2013/02/thank-you-nemo-nine-observations-id-like-to-retain-guest-post/">Originally published</a> on the new blog Boston Streets. Here are things I observed and liked:</span></div>
<div dir="ltr" style="background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #555555; font-family: 'PT Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 14px; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<div style="border: 0px; font-family: inherit; font-size: 14px; font-style: inherit; line-height: 1.6; margin-bottom: 2.4rem; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; text-align: inherit; vertical-align: baseline;">
1. <b>Communing with your community</b>: So many people are outside shoveling, chatting, and generally being helpful to neighbors and passers-by. I actually live in a neighborhood! That word has meaning.</div>
</div>
<div dir="ltr" style="background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #555555; font-family: 'PT Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 14px; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
</div>
<br />
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #555555; font-family: 'PT Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 1.6; margin-bottom: 2.4rem; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: 14px; font-style: inherit; line-height: 1.6; text-align: inherit;">2. </span><b style="font-family: inherit; font-size: 14px; font-style: inherit; line-height: 1.6; text-align: inherit;">Streets without cars are so wide and calm</b><span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: 14px; font-style: inherit; line-height: 1.6; text-align: inherit;">: Walking smack down the middle of Magazine Street in Cambridge had us (lots of people, young and old, with dogs and pulling sleds) admiring the trees, churches, and excellent buildings on each side.</span></div>
<div dir="ltr" style="background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #555555; font-family: 'PT Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 14px; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<div style="border: 0px; font-family: inherit; font-size: 14px; font-style: inherit; line-height: 1.6; margin-bottom: 2.4rem; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; text-align: inherit; vertical-align: baseline;">
3. <b>We don’t need so much on-street parking</b>. Where did all those cars banned from the emergency routes, or alternate sides go? Could they always park there and return some of that streetscape for bike lanes, wider sidewalks, and more trees?</div>
<div style="border: 0px; font-family: inherit; font-size: 14px; font-style: inherit; line-height: 1.6; margin-bottom: 2.4rem; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; text-align: inherit; vertical-align: baseline;">
Community Research Tip: Count the number of cars on your street that remain snow-covered each day. Seven days post storm, see how many cars are stored on your street. Do we really need to provide so much street parking?</div>
<div style="border: 0px; font-family: inherit; font-size: 14px; font-style: inherit; line-height: 1.6; margin-bottom: 2.4rem; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; text-align: inherit; vertical-align: baseline;">
4. <b>Owning cars is an incredible pain in the neck</b>: I wish that car owners would remember the hours spent and the trouble of unburying their cars and then the losing the hard-won clean spaces when they return from the errand. On-street parking isn’t free and it is public space, so maybe more cars could live in off-street parking, even the paid variety.</div>
<div style="border: 0px; font-family: inherit; font-size: 14px; font-style: inherit; line-height: 1.6; margin-bottom: 2.4rem; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; text-align: inherit; vertical-align: baseline;">
5. <b>Slowed traffic speeds make walking nicer:</b> On Sunday, with narrowed and slippery streets, what traffic there was traveled at respectful speeds. Drivers were courteous and thoughtful about pedestrians that often shared the road way. So nice!</div>
<div style="border: 0px; font-family: inherit; font-size: 14px; font-style: inherit; line-height: 1.6; margin-bottom: 2.4rem; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; text-align: inherit; vertical-align: baseline;">
6. <b>Some snow mounds make great people space</b>. The giant mountain in the Trader Joe’s parking lot had 10 kids sledding on it. Another on my street had a tunnel carved out. The big icy bulb-outs at crossroads keep traffic away from the sidewalk. It makes me yearn for less asphalt. How low can we go?</div>
<div style="border: 0px; font-family: inherit; font-size: 14px; font-style: inherit; line-height: 1.6; margin-bottom: 2.4rem; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; text-align: inherit; vertical-align: baseline;">
7. <b>Driving was restricted to absolutely-need-a-car errands:</b> Few cars were out moving, because actually using your car required uncovering it. It seemed that most people were getting things done without them.</div>
<div style="border: 0px; font-family: inherit; font-size: 14px; font-style: inherit; line-height: 1.6; margin-bottom: 2.4rem; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; text-align: inherit; vertical-align: baseline;">
8. <b>Valuing mass transit and wishing there were more of it:</b> As we were walking around, as some point, we wanted to hop in the T, or the bus, and cover some distance. It was so disappointing to remember that the MBTA was closed and we couldn’t get there from here. And I know that during the week, as those who haven’t dug out their cars, or don’t want to face the difficult parking seek to get to work, they will wish there were more transit options where someone else does the driving and no parking is required.</div>
</div>
<div dir="ltr" style="background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #555555; font-family: 'PT Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 14px; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<div style="border: 0px; font-family: inherit; font-size: 14px; font-style: inherit; line-height: 1.6; margin-bottom: 2.4rem; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; text-align: inherit; vertical-align: baseline;">
9. <b>Seamless connections of pedestrian routes matter</b>: Walking through the narrow shoveled troughs along the sidewalk is fun, as long as you don’t have a stroller, rolling suitcase, or wheelchair. But it is really annoying to hit the snow-blocked intersections selfish (lazy? vacationing?) neighbors who haven’t shoveled to connect their stretch of the path to the next one. This should remind us of all the roads and routes that we never walk for lack of sidewalk or traffic light or connecting ramp.</div>
<div style="border: 0px; font-family: inherit; font-size: 14px; font-style: inherit; line-height: 1.6; margin-bottom: 2.4rem; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; text-align: inherit; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: 14px; font-style: inherit; line-height: 1.6; text-align: inherit;">So as we go back to our work-week routine, and experience frustration and irritation that it isn’t like normal, let’s think also about what we loved over the weekend, and let’s make more of that.</span></div>
</div>
</div>
Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02127609476881611549noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6973565365969366405.post-39172931679832492152012-05-02T08:11:00.000-07:002012-05-02T08:12:24.884-07:00Industrial Capitalism vs Collaborative Economy<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-0-NjXRUFIcU/T6FONCvSzEI/AAAAAAAAC9c/iWfagLaua4I/s1600/topimg_16412_propaganda_poster_300x400.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-0-NjXRUFIcU/T6FONCvSzEI/AAAAAAAAC9c/iWfagLaua4I/s320/topimg_16412_propaganda_poster_300x400.jpg" width="240" /></a></div>
Here are the slides for the talk on the <a href="http://www.slideshare.net/rmchase/industrial-to-collaborative-economy">collaborative economy</a> I gave at TEDx Harlem. As soon as I get a nice video of that talk, I'll post it. Here are the words that go with the slides.<br />
<span class="fullpost"><br /></span><br />
<span class="fullpost">
TEDx Harlem </span><br />
<span class="fullpost">A couple of weeks ago, the Encyclopedia Brittanica announced that it would stop publishing its print edition, after 244 years. That is a long time. It feels like the end of an era. “This has nothing to do with Wikipedia or Google” said its President.
Maybe. Maybe it is just part of the diminished demand for print. Or maybe that it is really hard to compete with the 145,000 people who actively worked on <a href="http://www.blogger.com/www.wikipedia.org">wikipedia</a> last month.
I went and looked up their stats -- at the source of course -- 4m articles in English; 270 different-language wikipedias. How can you compete with that? </span>The encylopaedia brittanica’s announcement is just another part in a trend I’ve been observing and thinking about. It is another sign that we are moving from Industrial Capitalism to a Collaborative Economy.<br />
<br />
<span class="fullpost">Over the last couple hundred years, industrialization honed a specific kind of capitalism. Companies were centralied and hierarchical. With Encyclpiedia Brittanica, I’m sure there is a small number of article writers and editors; each with their own area of expertise -- no doubt rightly deserved. But they would never ever imagine letting unvetted people -- lots of them, and unknown! -- write or edit articles. </span>Wikipedia turned this idea on its head. It is distributed -- meaning that the writers are everywhere, and they are self selecting. They participate because they feel like it.<br />
<br />
The result is an enormous diversity of editors and expertise.
A collaborative economy thrives on this diversity. It is endlessly experimenting, learning, adapting, and evolving.
Industrial capitalism is the opposite. Standardization within a company -- a form of monoculture -- is how it saves money, reduces costs, and becomes the dominant producer. And once it is dominant, it hates change. Changes costs money and is uncertain, so it will do everything to defend the status quo.<br />
<br />
I have to add in here a quick caveat. I don’t really think there are two opposing economies at work, or that things are so cut and dried. There is lots and lots of grey. I do think that we have pretty much maxed out on the benefits to be gleaned from the Industrial Capitalism approach. The worldwide Occupy movement attests to that. Pre-industrial revolution the vast majority of us lived in hovels, but hey! we were self employed! Today, 50 percent of the private sector workforce works for BIG companies, and those big companies control vastly more than 50% of the wealth, and political power. The signature of the collaborative economy is an increasing role for individuals. There is LOTS to be gained from this approach, and we will see more and more of it that thanks to the internet. OK, so now back to painting things in black and white, so that the contrasts are nice and clear.<br />
<br />
Bell Telephone, founded in 1877, and then bought by AT&T in 1899. It was built on its huge trove of patents and grew bigger and bigger. At one point, it had over 1 million people working for it. It was broken up in 1984. It was broken up into 7 baby bells. But now, one of these babies, <a href="http://www.blogger.com/www.att.com">ATT</a>, is itself the 7th largest company in the US. Think of all the money and infrastructure and effort and people it took to build that company over the last 150 years!<br />
<br />
Contrast that with <a href="http://www.blogger.com/www.skype.com">Skype</a>. Skype is 9 years old, and have 663m registered users. They built a huge telco without paying for or building out the physical infrastructure! Instead, we individuals all happily contributed. It is our internet connections, our personal computers, and our video cameras of individuals. Stuff we’ve already paid for.
so what do we learn?<br />
<br />
That Industrial capitalism seeks monopoly status and control -- the more the companies have, the more they control, using their closed proprietary systems and way of doing things, the better. Which is in contrast to the collaborative economy. These companies get bigger by maximizing participation -- usually through openness.<br />
<br />
In fact, a big piece of the collaborative economy is built on the economics of free. By that I mean assets that have been already bought and paid for (like Skype), or excess capacity (like Wikipedia). If you as a company want to take advantage of these great resources, you have to be open, and willing to cooperate.
Industrial capitalism makes its money on either scale -- getting so incredibly big that it can manufacture things very cheaply -- or by keeping its expertise very close through trade secrets and patents that it lets others use at great expense.<br />
<br />
Because <a href="http://www.blogger.com/www.flickr.com">Flickr</a> is such a Peers Incorporated company, I had to put them in here. the industrial capitalism way of doing things would be <a href="http://www.blogger.com/www.gettyimages.com">Getty images</a>, with 80m images. The collaborative economy way of doing it gives us Flickr, which has amassed 6 billion images in just 7 years. And you have to say that the Flickr images more accurately portray the world as it really is.<br />
<br />
There is Network TV as opposed to <a href="http://www.blogger.com/www.youtube.com">YouTube</a>. YouTube has more video uploaded each month, than the 3 major networks created in 60 years. Is a lot of this stuff junk? Yes, absolutely, but so is the “Bachelorette”.<br />
<br />
We see the collaborative economy in every sector. Even banking.
<a href="http://www.blogger.com/www.prosper.com">Prosper</a> is a company in which individuals lend money to other individuals. It is 7 years old and already has 1.3 million members. It has made $314m of loans. If one of those lending individuals goes bankrupt -- it isn’t the end of the world.<br />
<br />
The collaborative Economy is delightfully resilient. Industrial Capitalism, with its huge behemoths, produces companies that are “too big to fail.” Yet we know they will one day.
While both systems could share value better with individuals, it seems that the collaborative economy is the one that will do it -- because remember, it seeks to maximize the participation of others, and if its going to succeed in the long run, it has to share more equitably. We will see more and more web-based companies that partner with individuals to help them make money.<br />
<br />
I heard this great anecdote: my father had one job in his lifetime; I’ll have 7 jobs in mine, and my child will have 7 at the same time. The value sharing partnership between a web-based company and individuals will form a significant part of our economy future.<br />
<br />
I recently founded a company called Buzzcar. We operate in France, and will be opening here in New York shortly. With Buzzcar, <a href="http://www.blogger.com/www.buzzcar.com">car owners can rent out their cars to their friends and neighbors</a> in a safe, secure, and standardized way.
I think of the car owners as Auto-preneurs, and they get 65% of the revenue generated, in contrast to the business model of traditional car sharing and car rental companies. Buzzcar builds the technology, operational, communications, and contractual support, sets a minimum standard for good drivers and safe cars, insures each car and person during the rental and with 24-hour roadside assistance, and does the payment collections. The owner is in charge of his car, and inviting his friends and neighbors to share his car. And he can make about $1000/month. You can see that we have all types of owners and cars, and all types of drivers too.<br />
<br />
I have a goal of getting everyone to share their cars, dramatically reducing the numbers of cars needed to satisfy a given population, dramatically reducing the numbers of parked cars that clog our city streets and make our homes expensive, and dramatically reducing the enormous bite car transportation takes out of personal budgets.<br />
<br />
And I know that the collaborative economy approach can work, even in a sector that seems so suited to big huge projects, because of my colleagues at carpooling.com.
They are a 10 year old German company that provides <a href="http://www.blogger.com/www.carpooling.com">ridesharing</a> services throughout Europe, and shortly the US. Every single day, they transport as many people as would fill 130 Amtrak trains. Every month, they have more than 1 million people sharing trips. In fact, Carpooling.com, and the car drivers and the riding passengers, move more people than travel the length of Amtraks’ NE corridor.<br />
<br />
Something that I haven’t yet mentioned, but that is really dear to my heart, is the fact that in the collaborative economy, one dollar is not like another dollar. The social intangibles are visible and valued. One of Buzzcar’s borrowers had mentioned to the car owner, that they were using the car to get to an Island ferry. The owner sent her an email with a list of the island highlights -- where to go and what to see. You won’t find that level of personalization and customization in the Industrial capitalism model. It costs too much money.<br />
<br />
Some more examples:
-- the mainstream media vs the blogosphere -- here is a short list of companies, many of which you’ll recognize, that are bringing us this new economic model. (airbnb, etsy, eBay, fiverr, topcoder, zilok, rentallic)<br />
<br />
And to close with a final lovely example: we can contrast <a href="http://www.blogger.com/www.maps.google.com">Google Maps</a> with <a href="http://www.blogger.com/www.openstreetmaps.org">Open street maps</a>. Google maps, which I know, use, and love, was created with a car driving on every single road in the world and mapping them all. that is a big job! We can contrast that with Open Street maps, that created the same with local hobbyists build out the open street map platform. Today, Open street maps offers maps that are as good -- and they think better -- than Google’s. Why? Because, just like wikipedia, they have thousands of people updating them each and every day.<br />
<br />
When the Haiti Earthquake struck and the emergency responders flooded in, it was impossible for them to find their way through the city that had been poorly mapped, and those existing maps were clearly completely out-of-date for what was needed. With the help of a group called Crisis Mappers Net and released satellite photos, this group of <a href="http://vimeo.com/9182869">people drew in the map</a> of Port-au-Prince over the subsequent week, you can see them working.<br />
<br />
To sum it all up, Industrial Capitalism is built and evolved to put the corporation’s survival a the center. I hope you enjoy those empty, headless suits I found.
And now, thanks to the Internet, we see the rise of a collaborative economy, that puts people at the center.</div>Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02127609476881611549noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6973565365969366405.post-79089980286841700092012-02-05T02:14:00.001-08:002012-02-05T11:26:10.389-08:00Getting a Velib Annual Membership. Part 3Last summer Velib made some helpful changes to their service! Amphibious bicycles for crossing the Seine? <br /><br /><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-ur68kxXDTaU/Ty5ZEW0nhxI/AAAAAAAABHQ/Y9ouGHvBH-Y/s400/4193508602_811dcdcb74.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left:1em; margin-right:1em"><img border="0" height="288" width="400" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-ur68kxXDTaU/Ty5ZEW0nhxI/AAAAAAAABHQ/Y9ouGHvBH-Y/s400/4193508602_811dcdcb74.jpg" /></a></div><br />No, not yet, but almost as good. They made it much easier to get an annual, weekly, and daily membership. I thought I'd say, "Thank you," and post a quick summary. They updated their <a href="http://velib.paris.fr/">website</a> adding an <a href="http://http://en.velib.paris.fr/">English</a> version and made it possible to purchase all of their subscriptions online with a credit card. So, for anyone without a European debit card with a chip in it, you can now pay for Velib online with your credit card.<br /><span class="fullpost"> <br />The prices charged for the service went up a little bit, but still a bargain at €1.70 for access to Velib for 24 hours (30 minutes at a time), or €8.00 for a week (30 minutes at a time). Remember, if your trip is longer than 30 minutes you will still pay additional <a href="http://en.velib.paris.fr/Subscriptions-and-fees/Usage-charges">usage charges</a>. <br /><br />English telephone support will make it easier for tourists, should you ever encounter problems at the stations. And, best of all, for anyone planning a long visit to Paris, you can buy an annual subscription for €29 and pick up a "Velib' Express" card at any of the 20 city halls in Paris. The card makes using Velib' even more convenient, no more entering your long ID number and PIN at the kiosk, just hold it over the scanner for the bike you want, wait a few seconds for the light to turn green (why does it take so long?) and go! </span>Roy Russellhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17388781908140388210noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6973565365969366405.post-77150202843371342752011-12-11T12:52:00.000-08:002011-12-11T13:11:05.133-08:00What force moves people?<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-04bUDc89vXM/TuUZ6vPrFSI/AAAAAAAAClI/DTNPo4dfB8s/s1600/minardmap.jpg"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 152px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-04bUDc89vXM/TuUZ6vPrFSI/AAAAAAAAClI/DTNPo4dfB8s/s320/minardmap.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5684978601530430754" /></a><br />I have been reading <a href="http://www.amazon.com/War-Peace-Leo-Tolstoy/dp/0307266931">War and Peace</a> by Tolstoy. He is just amazing. He sees through every human action and exposes each frailty, ego, fear, irrationality, hubris. No one escapes. The action of the novel takes place between 1805 and 1820 – the Napoleonic wars. Wikipedia cites the death toll at 1.8 million people. You should look at the big version of a <a href="http://strangemaps.files.wordpress.com/2007/12/minardmap.jpg">very famous map of the army</a>, which shows how many people set out (beige) and how many dribbled back (black).<br /><br />As I've been reading, I keep thinking about current wars, and non-wars (climate change and Durban), and returning to Tolstoy’s key question that we – entrepreneurs, marketers, politicians – seek to understand:<br /><br /><span style="font-weight:bold;">What force moves peoples?</span><br /><br />In Chapter 1 of the Epilogue Tolstoy goes on a rant. There were so many delicious bits, I had to pick them out for you. But read the whole book. Absolutely wonderful.<br /><br />….the goal of the good of all human civilization, usually understood as the people occupying the small northwest corner of a large continent….<span class="fullpost"><br /><br />..the historian knows the goal towards which mankind is being led (for one this goal is the greatness of the Roman, Spanish, or French state; for another it is freedom, equality, a certain kind of civilization in a small corner of the world known as Europe.)<br /><br />...During this twenty-year period of time an enormous number of fields go unplowed; houses are burned; trade changes direction; millions of people become poor, become rich, migrate; and millions of Christians, who profess the law of love of their neighbor, kill each other.<br /><br />…At the end of the eighteenth century, some two dozen men got together in Paris and started talking about all men being equal and free. That led people all over France to start slaughtering and drowning each other.”<br /><br />….At the same time there was in France a man of genius – Napolean. He defeated everybody everywhere – that is, he killed a lot of people – because he was a great genius. And he went off for some reason to kill Africans, and he killed them so well, and was so cunning and clever, that, on coming back to France, he ordered everybody to obey him. And everbody obeyed him. Having become emperor, he again went to kill people in Italy, Austria, And Prussia. And there he killed a lot….<br /></span>Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02127609476881611549noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6973565365969366405.post-51224420321089651942011-10-06T08:34:00.000-07:002011-10-07T02:43:30.666-07:003 Benefits of Autolib You Aren't Expecting<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-Q1biaYIacGE/To3NlnDtZ4I/AAAAAAAACXQ/8KtcAJn2-D8/s1600/Screen%2Bshot%2B2011-10-06%2Bat%2B5.44.43%2BPM.png"><img style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 10px;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 231px; height: 239px;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-Q1biaYIacGE/To3NlnDtZ4I/AAAAAAAACXQ/8KtcAJn2-D8/s320/Screen%2Bshot%2B2011-10-06%2Bat%2B5.44.43%2BPM.png" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5660406352697976706" /></a><br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-XFAknJ4ZZxo/To3NhAQ6qII/AAAAAAAACXI/wQJsRNLY1Qs/s1600/Screen%2Bshot%2B2011-10-06%2Bat%2B5.43.08%2BPM.png"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 199px; height: 197px;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-XFAknJ4ZZxo/To3NhAQ6qII/AAAAAAAACXI/wQJsRNLY1Qs/s320/Screen%2Bshot%2B2011-10-06%2Bat%2B5.43.08%2BPM.png" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5660406273564911746" /></a><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />The funny thing about sharing, is that there are usually a whole bunch of unexpected and unanticipated benefits that people don’t expect and don’t anticipate.<br /><br />For Zipcar, sharing rather than owning your own car meant that:<br />-- You can choose the car that fits the needs of each specific trip.<br />-- You have instant access to a “personal fleet” of 6000 cars parked across North America and England.<br />-- You never have to maintain or repair it<br /><br />Try doing that with your car!<br /><br />So what will AutoLib bring that is a surprise? By writing this down, I’m anticipating, which kinds of ruins my argument. But, here goes:<span class="fullpost">Unanticipated Benefits of AutoLib <br /><br />-- <span style="font-weight:bold;">Electric cars will be demystified</span>. Everyone will have seen them going around everywhere, experienced their commonness, and lots and lots of people will have driven them. Today, the arguments and fears about electric cars are by people who have no first-hand experience. Now, this discussion around electric cars will stem from a first-hand experience. Much better!<br /><br />-- <span style="font-weight:bold;">We’ll automatically choose our mode of travel based on the trip</span>, rather than mindlessly and routinely getting into our own cars. This will be a sea change for many people. What an idea! Should I walk, bike, metro, taxi, <a href="www.buzzcar.com">Buzzcar</a> or AutoLib to get where I need to go in the city? And this new way of thinking will just be second nature, like checking the weather when you wake up in the morning before you choosing your clothes for the day.<br /><br />-- <span style="font-weight:bold;">We will travel comfortably and routinely between different modes of transport</span>. The whole frightening and ugly-named concept -- “multi-modal”-- will be a natural reality that includes the car in those mode choices. Very few people will be mono-modal: <span style="font-style:italic;">only</span> public transit or <span style="font-style:italic;">only</span> by car. It should bring these two groups together, less divisiveness between the camps. It will make negotiating for rights of way between alocation of public space have more consensus.<br /></span>Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02127609476881611549noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6973565365969366405.post-4603312437570286242011-10-02T10:23:00.000-07:002011-10-07T02:44:33.509-07:00Autolib Beta Phase<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-t2iefWnBlo4/Toie9qWgZ8I/AAAAAAAACVc/BzoH_wwWUwM/s1600/photo%2B%252893%2529.JPG"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 239px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-t2iefWnBlo4/Toie9qWgZ8I/AAAAAAAACVc/BzoH_wwWUwM/s320/photo%2B%252893%2529.JPG" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5658947713968924610" /></a><br />After years of discussion and planning, and less than one year since the contract was awarded, Autolib went live today, October 2. It will have about 38 cars are the road, being driven by an invited set of users, and then go live to the public on December 1 with 250 cars. Over the next year, it is supposed to build out to 3000 cars.<br /><br />Autolib: 3000 electric cars, paid for in 1/2 hour increments, on demand, for use in greater Paris. Comes with parking! I think of them as taxis you drive yourself, with taxi-like <a href="http://www.autolib.eu/nos-tarifs/">prices</a>: 5-7 euros the first half hour (after you've paid a gating fee) and even more the second and third half hours. <br /><br />My first kneejerk reaction is the shock at the branding. I was thinking that at those prices, it was going to be heavily used by businessmen and well-to-do women to get around Paris. Now that I see them, I think they've lost this primary market.<br /><br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-lYfrOPew-Gk/ToifolQr-oI/AAAAAAAACVk/o32raKrG6pE/s1600/photo%2B%252895%2529.JPG"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 239px; height: 320px;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-lYfrOPew-Gk/ToifolQr-oI/AAAAAAAACVk/o32raKrG6pE/s320/photo%2B%252895%2529.JPG" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5658948451336714882" /></a><br />Here is a picture of the station, which comes at a cost to each city town of 50,000€. For Paris, this will add up to 25 million euros. <br /><br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-zFLTLjqX4zA/ToihjbbWsLI/AAAAAAAACVs/vtAJJSVZROQ/s1600/photo%2B%252896%2529.JPG"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 239px;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-zFLTLjqX4zA/ToihjbbWsLI/AAAAAAAACVs/vtAJJSVZROQ/s320/photo%2B%252896%2529.JPG" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5658950561821012146" /></a><br /><br />The point of the station? It is a video camera connection with customer service who will help you scan your license and then see your face, and thus decide to sell you a membership to AutoLib.<br /><br />Here is what I find really shocking: this enormous cost is all because the French do not have electronic driving records that can be checked in real time. This is a pain that I've been feeling with <a href="http://www.buzzcar.com">Buzzcar</a>. We get around it by also asking for a photo of the individual's identity card as well as a proof of residence at an address (a bill less than 3 months old). I've advised the French government that they really need to bring their driving records into the computer age. It hadn't occurred to me the size of this cost, in Paris alone, until I did the math on the Autolib stations.<br /><br />So I don't sound crotchedy. Here is a picture of me being given a test drive in an Autolib by a smart, bright, well informed young man who is an "Autolib Ambassador."<br /><br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-yIw_t2eEcoY/ToiiEvo_6XI/AAAAAAAACV8/5HK3TPaAGDw/s1600/photo%2B%252894%2529.JPG"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 240px;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-yIw_t2eEcoY/ToiiEvo_6XI/AAAAAAAACV8/5HK3TPaAGDw/s320/photo%2B%252894%2529.JPG" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5658951134182631794" /></a><br /><br />Oh, to give you the link to Autolib:<br /><br />not .COM (library management software, whatever that is)<br />not .FR (taken by a carsharing service in Lyon)<br />not .ORG (Lyon group has that as well)<br /><br />but <a href="http://www.autolib.eu/">autolib.EU</a><br /><br />hunh.Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02127609476881611549noreply@blogger.com8tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6973565365969366405.post-16070021192007903482011-07-18T08:53:00.000-07:002011-07-18T09:17:57.703-07:00Velib Celebrates 100 million trips<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-LFoFI4oQhYE/TiRcTR218hI/AAAAAAAABYA/O1_HGv9PB5k/s1600/velib.jpg"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 250px; height: 284px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-LFoFI4oQhYE/TiRcTR218hI/AAAAAAAABYA/O1_HGv9PB5k/s320/velib.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5630726920400663058" /></a><br />Translating from a City of Paris press release:<br /><br />In Paris, where we celebrated the 100 millionth Velib trip since July 2007, the popularity of the service hasn't diminished. There are 170 thousand subscribers and almost 100 thousand rentals a day at the 1700 stations that cover the capital. According to JC Decaux, the service has seen "a massive increase in recent months" thanks to a cloudless spring.<br /><br />The city and its concessionaire share other satisfactions: a net reduction in vandalism. Shortly after the launch of the service, stupified users deplored the impressive number of bikes with flats, twitsted, stolen or broken. According to JC Decaux, the vandalism was reduced by 2/3 between 2009 and 2010. Is the anti-Velib violence no longer in fashion? "Shared bikes have arrived as part of the urban landscape" says M. Asseraf. Mme Lepetit prefers to see the change as the result of "public ad campaigns emphasizing civic spirit and responsibility."<br /><br />All the stations haven't benefited from this enlightenment, as the residents of Barbes (18th arrondissement) or in proximity of the beltway can attest, but the city refuses to release the vandalism statistics by neighborhood "because this will stigmatize" explains the mayor.Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02127609476881611549noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6973565365969366405.post-57965966178941185382011-06-26T10:11:00.000-07:002011-06-26T10:22:01.490-07:00Peak Car Use: It is Happening<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-4Tg54FSW6tQ/TgdpG8rjt-I/AAAAAAAABQc/IZAv55Y1ACs/s1600/rimmer-kenworthy-1.jpg"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 305px;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-4Tg54FSW6tQ/TgdpG8rjt-I/AAAAAAAABQc/IZAv55Y1ACs/s320/rimmer-kenworthy-1.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5622578227884308450" /></a><br />I first heard the term "peak cars" about two weeks ago. And then "peak car use" showed up again in this <a href="http://worldstreets.wordpress.com/2011/06/23/newman-and-kenworth-on-peak-car-use/">research report</a> <br /><br />This trend is happening not only in the US, but is consistent with research of driving data in 7 other countries. <br /><br />As possible causes of ‘Peak Car Use’, the paper offers up the following six factors:<br /><br />1. Hitting the Marchetti Wall<br />2. The Growth of Public Transport<br />3. The Reversal of Urban Sprawl<br />4. The Aging of Cities<br />5. The Growth of a Culture of Urbanism<br />6. The Rise in Fuel Prices<br /><br />Go read the article. Then figure out if you too are driving your car less. At it is, most people use their car's only 5% of the time. The other 95%?<br /><br />put it up for rent to your friends and neighbors with <blockquote>Buzzcar<a href="http://www.buzzcar.com/fr/content/"></a></blockquote> (if you live in France). Or maybe just sell it altogether and use someone else's.<br /><br />Carsharing is more and more becoming the obvious choice for car mobility.Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02127609476881611549noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6973565365969366405.post-70921261116654384642011-05-02T23:47:00.000-07:002011-05-03T00:29:19.761-07:00Testifying before Congress: I Can't get a Word in EdgewiseLooking for the written transcript of my testimony (March 9, 2011), I stumbled across this video clip, as prepared by the Republican-controlled House Subcommittee on Energy and Commerce <a href="http://energycommerce.house.gov/News/PRArticle.aspx?NewsID=8322">website</a><br /><br />It was billed on their page as: <br /><br />"Rep. Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) questioned a supporter of the rules about how well the Internet works without government regulation, noting: “You set up a very successful company using the Internet as it was, basically the status quo Internet, and you did that without a whole lot of trouble: is that right?” <br /><br /><iframe width="480" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/dFVgTK2qWr4" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe><br /><br />Count how many words I get to say (5?) compared to the torrent of her words. If memory serves me, what happens after this clip is she moves on to "question" the person next to me allowing them the same "response time." Yet on the Republican website about the testimony, all the quotes are from the Republican congressmen making their statements, with zero quotes from those experts who were testifying. <br /><br />I realize this is politics, but the spin is pretty scandalous. The fact is, that the rules I got to play by in 2000, are not the rules start-ups today live under. In 2005, the FCC was stripped of its right to ensure fair play on the Internet, and immediately thereafter ensued lots of bad behavior on the part of the big telecommunications companies. The FCC Order, the one was testifying for, and that the House overturned, and that is now before the Senate, was to reinstate the FCC's right protect the openness of the Internet.<br /><br />Associated blog entries: <a href="http://networkmusings.blogspot.com/2011/03/testifying-before-congress-net.html">I wrote up immediately after testifying</a>. and <a href="http://networkmusings.blogspot.com/2011/04/net-neutrality-protects-innovation-jobs.html">OpEd in Politico</a>Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02127609476881611549noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6973565365969366405.post-20203120267320256322011-04-07T02:05:00.000-07:002011-04-07T02:10:30.279-07:00Net Neutrality protects Innovation & JobsHere is my <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0411/52540.html">OpEd</a> published in Politico, days before vote in House on whether to overturn FCC ruling that protects net neutrality.<br /><br />You can read my testimony before Congress and my r<a href="http://networkmusings.blogspot.com/2011/03/testifying-before-congress-net.html">eactions to that experience</a> in previous blog.Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02127609476881611549noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6973565365969366405.post-59393112823586146192011-04-07T02:03:00.001-07:002011-04-07T02:05:38.412-07:00My mom's got muscles<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-MM1B-wkrq64/TZ1-TP8tALI/AAAAAAAAA9s/-4yBZXKjHUI/s1600/0_IMAG0296%2B%25281%2529.jpg"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 242px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-MM1B-wkrq64/TZ1-TP8tALI/AAAAAAAAA9s/-4yBZXKjHUI/s320/0_IMAG0296%2B%25281%2529.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5592765181427777714" /></a><br />Check it out. 85 years old and can do 10 chin ups. Here she is with trainer she has been working with. Will you look at that bicep? Don't want to meet her in an alley.Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02127609476881611549noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6973565365969366405.post-25971448245182742742011-03-12T11:31:00.000-08:002011-03-12T13:27:23.311-08:00Testifying before Congress: Net Neutrality<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-CWAIurvHWl4/TXvNpfELZJI/AAAAAAAAAzk/YWGp_vfAuvo/s1600/IMG_0450.jpg"><img style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 10px;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 239px;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-CWAIurvHWl4/TXvNpfELZJI/AAAAAAAAAzk/YWGp_vfAuvo/s320/IMG_0450.jpg" border="0" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5583282275653215378"></a><br />I testified this week to the House Subcommittee on Communications and the Internet. <br /><br />Here is my <a href="http://republicans.energycommerce.house.gov/Media/file/Hearings/Telecom/030911/Chase.pdf">written testimony</a> and here is my <a href="http://www.publicknowledge.org/robin-chase-oral-testimony-march-9-2011-hearing">oral testimony</a> and here the <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jIKC_yClRKI&feature=relmfu">video version</a>.<br />In general, the Republicans who wished to repeal the FCC order tried to: <br /><br />• Confuse regulating access to the Internet (telecommunications providers: i.e. Verizon and ATT for the vast bulk of Americans) which is the subject of the FCC order, and regulating services (Google, Amazon, Facebook) which aren’t under the FCC’s jurisdiction.<br /><br />• Confuse controlling Internet Openness (which everyone agrees is a good thing) with controlling Access to -- and Who Defines -- that Internet: 1) an industry that tends toward monopoly power or 2) the government who should serve the American public’s interests.<br /><br />• Confuse innovation, jobs, and investment in the economy created by entrepreneurs and small businesses (75% of all jobs over the last 10 years and what percent of the economy?) with the “innovation,” jobs, and investment of two telecommunications giants (ATT invested $19b last year in infrastructure). <br /><br />Congressmen who had done some work in preparation for my testimony raised the following points against my personal testimony:<br /><span class="fullpost"><br />• Asked by two members (a talking point?): When the search term “carsharing” is entered into Google, Zipcar has an ad that runs above the first search result. How does Zipcar’s ability to buy a paid ad sync with my testimony that startups can’t afford to pay for premium services? <br /><br />The first time this was asked, I said that it wasn’t relevant. What was a better comparison was to think of newspapers, where big companies could take out full pages ads, and little companies only tiny classifieds, and that the internet had changed that access into one of a meritocracy. The second time I was asked, I said “This isn’t the question at hand” to which the Congressman replied that indeed, it was his question (true). A thoughtful short response should have been: The fact that an eleven-year old company can afford to buy a Google ad has no bearing on whether a startup could afford to pay a premium for access to the Internet, nor whether other structural hurdles could be established by the duopoly gatekeepers to the Internet. <br /><br />Several times, Republicans raised the idea that if the unregulated Internet worked for me to start up Zipcar before, why did I think it wouldn’t work in the future? One Congressman even repeated to me two times how easy it must have been for me to start Zipcar (I didn’t let her get away with that). The response I tried to make, and I don’t know if I did, was that the Internet was a baby industry back then, the telcos power was much less, and in fact, the industry was regulated and under the jurisdiction of the FCC (which was later taken away in 2005).<br /><br />• My favorite question: It appears that Zipcar gets free parking that taxpayers have paid for, depriving these taxpayers of on-street parking dedicated to a for-profit company, as well as received other government grants to succeed….not clear to me how this has any bearing at all.<br /><br />To which I replied that during my three-year tenure as CEO I had paid for municipal parking won through RFPs and had received no federal grant money at all. Gigi Sohn of Public Knowledge later reminded me that the carriers have received rights of way, spectrum rights, and millions (billions?) of dollars of subsidies from government.<br /><br />• Two ill-formed, grand-standing, and not quite completed questions were trying to relate to my sensibilities as a business woman. They seemed to be aiming at this point: Wasn’t the only way to respond to market demand to build out more infrastructure? And shouldn’t a company be able to set prices any way it wanted to without government interference?<br /><br />One of the questioners cut me off after a sentence reply saying that his allotted time was up. And I think I didn’t answer well or clearly to the first time this question was asked. The answer which I managed to squeeze in later in answer to another Congressman’s question was a better one, although admittedly not as nicely said as written below:<br /><br />Capitalism works when markets respond to demand and competition. The Internet gatekeepers are at best an oligopoly and for most consumers a monopoly. These companies don’t need to respond to demand (they can create scarcity to raise prices) and they also don’t have to respond efficiently or cleverly because they have no competition. <br /></span><object id="BLOG_video-FAILED" class="BLOG_video_class" width="320" height="266" contentid="FAILED"></object>Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02127609476881611549noreply@blogger.com4tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6973565365969366405.post-62599632274661963122011-03-06T03:40:00.000-08:002011-03-06T03:46:25.981-08:00Net neutrality imperative to Protect InnovationHere is <a href="http://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=explorer&chrome=true&srcid=0BykZTf9ZQ_HYNGY1Mzc2ZjctZWYwZC00YmIyLTg0NWUtNmIxOThlZmRiOTVl&hl=en">OpEd</a> I wrote last week for Bloomberg Government, and the <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-03-03/zipcar-s-chase-favors-neutral-net-to-protect-startups-video.html">interview</a> I did for Bloomberg TV. <span class="fullpost"></span>Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02127609476881611549noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6973565365969366405.post-43703640754745213242011-01-09T04:44:00.000-08:002012-02-05T03:13:37.606-08:00Getting a Velib Annual Membership. Part 2<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://media.treehugger.com/assets/images/2011/10/velib20broken.jpg"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 468px; height: 351px;" src="http://media.treehugger.com/assets/images/2011/10/velib20broken.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></a><p>You will recall that my husband and I received our Navigo cards and were eagerly awaiting the arrival of our annual Velib memberships. This would allow each of us tie our Navigo card to our Velib account and use the Navigo card to unlock the Velib directly. As easy as a visit to the local pub, "put it on my tab," I'd be saying electronically. [for the record, this is literary metaphor, I’ve been to a pub about twice in my entire life.] No more lengthy interactions with the Velib kiosk. No more having to remember the number of the Velib locking post that has the bicycle I have so carefully selected as problem-free. Did I mention that some of the Velib stations are so big that half of the bicycles are on the other side of the street or around the corner? <br />
<br />
Imagine my excitement when my letter from Velib arrived. The day had finally come! I opened the letter to find that my application had been denied.<br />
<span class="fullpost">The Velib annual application requested a €29.00 fee, to be paid with a check. Thinking that a postal money order would suffice, my husband had purchased one from the local post office and included it with my application. Velib returned the postal money order explaining that they do not accept cash.<br />
<br />
<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_JeoJYh26r6E/TSnPGfpOQ-I/AAAAAAAAAkU/b7Le0A_qKo0/s1600/Postal%2BMoney%2BOrder1.jpg"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 400px; height: 226px;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_JeoJYh26r6E/TSnPGfpOQ-I/AAAAAAAAAkU/b7Le0A_qKo0/s400/Postal%2BMoney%2BOrder1.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5560202925446153186" /></a><br />
<br />
Now I have a €29.00 postal money order made out to Velib. I can't get my money refunded from the post office because we had thrown out the receipt (1. why would I want to keep the receipt? 2. why can't the Post Office give me money back without a receipt when the postal order is from me and I'm standing right in front of them with a passport?) <br />
<br />
So we request a checkbook from our bank. An online request of course. In order to expedite the checkbook, we selected "pickup at our branch". 3 weeks and 3 trips to the branch later we finally receive our checkbook. So we resubmit our applications with the €29.00 checks enclosed.<br />
<br />
A week later we are again denied. Now we learn the significance of the RIB. The "Relevé d'Identité Bancaire" is a piece of paper with 4 numbers on it. The bank ID number, the branch number, the account number, and a 2 digit RIB key, essentially a checksum calculated from the other 3 numbers. There is some other redundant information on the piece of paper like the name of the bank and their telephone number, but the essential data is contained in these 4 numbers. We entered all of these numbers in the specified fields on the Velib application form, the one which we printed out and submitted. So when the application instructions asked to include the RIB, my husband thought he had done it. But no, for some inexplicable reason it is necessary to include the special piece of paper the bank gives you copies of with the same 4 numbers on it.<br />
<br />
All of this wasn't entirely obvious to our French friends either. We asked them to look at the letter and see if they could tell what we were doing wrong. Only upon patient cross-examination did they discover that my husband had not sent in the RIB bank slip of paper in addition to filling out the required filled. <br />
<br />
"Of course! How could you be so stupid? Of course you must send in the RIB!" <br />
<br />
"But it contains the same information that I entered on the form," my husband protested. <br />
<br />
"But you must include it!"<br />
<br />
OK, so we send in the applications again. This time with the pre-printed form, the €29.00 personal check, and the the all important RIB piece of paper.<br />
<br />
Finally our annual memberships arrive. Two separate accounts, one for each of us. The letter tell us that we must now activate our membership by going online within 45 days. I picture someone at Velib headquarters who has been specifically designated to wait the 45 days for my account to expire. He's just sitting in a room with a clock and a calendar counting down. He's going to press a big red button which has been directly wired to my account if I don't stop him.<br />
<br />
I sign in with my special ID number I've been assigned and my secret PIN, which must be entered twice into two separate boxes. I'm not sure why one isn't enough.<br />
<br />
Et voila! I am signed in to my account. Velib thinks my name is Chase Robin, not Robin Chase, which will cause a moment's confusion the next time I try and sign in because in order to sign in I must enter my assigned number, my secret PIN (only once now) and my last name, which Velib thinks is "Robin". I'm not sure why they think this, since they got my husband's name right. <br />
<br />
RIght away I try to use my Navigo to get a Velib, but it doesn't work. Velib kiosk reports that it is not associated with any account. Has all our work been in vain? I go back and log into my Velib account and find that there is no Navigo card number associated with my account, even though giving my Navigo card number was an important step I had completed back in November. So I enter one in the field for Navigo card number.<br />
<br />
Now it works!! And it is really much easier than dealing with the kiosk. Now I think nothing of swiping my card and hopping on a Velib to ride just a few blocks. My travel time is cut in half getting to the train station. I check my account a few days later and am amused to see a long list of trips, every one of them under the 30 minute free limit.<br />
<br />
But wait! After 4 months of effort and an almost innumerable number of steps, my husband is not so lucky. Even though we applied in parallel, attended to each step in parallel, made all the same mistakes and missteps in parallel, when he enters his Navigo card into his Velib account he is told that “the staff will take it under consideration.” <br />
<br />
Now, if we can just figure out this one last thing...</span>Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02127609476881611549noreply@blogger.com8tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6973565365969366405.post-13725621358991021462011-01-01T04:07:00.000-08:002011-01-01T04:24:59.752-08:00<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://www.concierge.com/images/destinations/destinationguide/usa+canada/usa/newyork/newyorkcity/newyorkcity_022p.jpg"><img style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 10px;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 380px; height: 300px;" src="http://www.concierge.com/images/destinations/destinationguide/usa+canada/usa/newyork/newyorkcity/newyorkcity_022p.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></a><br />What does it really cost to get around in the US today? By get around, I mean car, subway, bus and not planes or hotel expenses. Data from 4 million <a href="http://www.mint.com">Mint.com</a> users tell us that it is cheaper in cities and more expensive in states where you have to drive long distances.<br /><br />I've been interested in aggregate data from Mint.com for a while now: 4 million users across the US, real data, from their credit cards and bank accounts, not remembered data. <span class="fullpost">And of course, my statistical self has to recognize that there is sampling bias of some kind with mint users. And it doesn’t take your cash expenditures into account either. If I had to guess, because these numbers are low, they don't include the cost of insurance (around $1100/yr), and obviously not depreciation (around $1500+/year). Regardless, the comparative data is interesting.<br /><br />But we can assume that for your car related purchases – i.e. the car, the maintenance, the fuel, the tires – most people do most of them with credit cards and primarily at stores that are actually vehicle-only retailers, so the data must be relatively clean.<br /><br />I broke Mint's system (or rather it timed out) when I tried to get Mint to give me the aggregate data for the whole US. This isn't one of their queries. I edited the URL in search of it. But Mind does let you query state by state, and for specific cities. <br /><br />So here it is: comparative “Auto & Transport” data of average monthly (yearly) expenditure – as eyeballed because the graphs don’t give precise tick marks. <br /><br /><a href="http://data.mint.com/region/us/new-york/new-http://data.mint.com/region/us/new-york/new-york">NYC</a>: $250/mo ($3000/yr)<br /><br /><a href="http://data.mint.com/region/us/massachusetts/boston">Boston</a>: $250 ($3000/yr)<br /><br /><a href="http://data.mint.com/region/us/california/san-francisco">San Francisco</a>: $340 ($4080/yr)<br /><br /><a href="http://data.mint.com/region/us/new-york">NYstate</a>: $310 ($3720/yr)<br /><br /><a href="http://data.mint.com/region/us/texas">Texas state</a>: $390 ($4680/yr)<br /><br /><a href="http://data.mint.com/region/us/massachusetts">Massachusetts state</a>: $300 ($4000/yr)<br /><br /><a href="http://data.mint.com/region/us/california">California stat</a>e: $410 ($4920/yr)<br /><br />If anyone manages to get the US data set to load, I'd love to see what those numbers are. Or if you can get this data in Mint's piechart format, that shows you what fraction of household budgets are spent on what, I <span style="font-style:italic;">really</span> want to see that.<br /></span>Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02127609476881611549noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6973565365969366405.post-66178124433894909192010-12-22T07:19:00.000-08:002011-03-17T07:25:58.197-07:00People Powered InnovationHere is an <a href="http://thrivable.net/?s=robin+chase">interview</a> I did for <a href="http://thrivable.net">Thrivable</a>.Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02127609476881611549noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6973565365969366405.post-20915454391738272322010-11-06T00:05:00.000-07:002010-11-06T00:16:49.651-07:00The Internet is Not Triple PlayFive years ago, when I first started focusing on the Internet, I attended a small meeting at the <a href="http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/">Harvard Berkman Center</a> that was given by the Chairman of the Federal Communications Commission. I was dumbstruck by the irrationality of what he was saying. And the FCC – which acronym I had previously glossed over with little understanding or interest – became an arm of government that I realized I should care about. <br /><br />The irrational ideas, so curious and intriguing and yes, dumb founding, to my outsider and newcomer self was that the FCC had special rules for telephone, and special rules for TV, and special rules for data, as if they weren’t all the same thing! Didn’t everyone know that it was all just 1s and 0s? totally interchangeable and free flowing over both the wired and wireless world? That it didn’t make sense to think of telephone as something different from Voice Over IP?<span class="fullpost"><br /><br />And then of course, I learned that I was the dumb one. The FCC’s structure stemmed from the long history of the evolution of the telephone over the 20th century, which had a lot to do with what was learned from dealing with railroads over the 19th century.<br /><br />The result is a bureaucracy and regulatory structure that just doesn’t make any sense for the underlying technical reality, but has structured vast ecosytems of companies built to respond to the old reality, and little inclined to change business models and give up existing profit streams (a problem in the energy and transportation sectors too).<br /><br />I recently signed onto a <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/41002510/On-Advancing-the-Open-Internet-by-Distinguishing-it-from-Specialized-Services">FCC comment</a> written by Seth Johnson that enunciates the difference between the services and the Internet. The many signers include Steve Wozniak, Clay Shirky, David Isenberg, David Weinberger, and David Reed. <br /><br />While the FCC letter reads pretty technically, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_P._Reed">David Reed</a> wrote a <a href="http://www.reed.com/blog-dpr/?p=47">beautiful essay</a> that explains in terms that everyone can understand, the distinction between the internet and the services.<br /><br />To give you a taste:<br /><br /><span style="font-style:italic;">..the Internet was created to solve a very specific design challenge – creating a way to allow all computer-mediated communication to interoperate in any way that made sense, no matter what type of computer or what medium of communications (even homing pigeons have been discussed as potential transport media). The Open Internet was designed as the one communications framework to rule them all.<br /><br />However, the FCC historically organizes itself around “services”, which are tightly bound to particular technologies. Satellite systems are not “radio” and telephony over radio is not the same service as telephony over wires. <br /><br />…The Internet really is “one ring to rule them all” – a framework unto itself, one that cannot be measured against its “wirelessness” or its “terrestriality”...It was carefully organized to incorporate innovations in transport of information, along with innovations in uses of such transport…What would happen if the FCC were to begin to recognize that all communications are to a large extent interchangeable? </span><br /><br />What would happen if the FCC recognized the technical and practical reality? Go read David’s piece and become informed in a dramatically faster and shorter period of time than it took me. <br /><br />The Internet does not equal Triple Play.<br /></span>Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02127609476881611549noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6973565365969366405.post-37286989920838552362010-10-19T02:14:00.000-07:002010-10-19T02:41:10.266-07:00Getting an Annual Velib Subscription<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_XEQf8MrlwEg/TL1m1abRb5I/AAAAAAAAAiA/qHFNp1du0V0/s1600/velib+station.jpg"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 219px;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_XEQf8MrlwEg/TL1m1abRb5I/AAAAAAAAAiA/qHFNp1du0V0/s320/velib+station.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5529688985293647762" /></a><br />Or, how bureaucracy and security norms can kill almost any good thing.<br /><br />Background: Velib has 20,000 bicycles for hire (free for < 30 minutes at a time) everywhere in Paris. This combined with a fairly bike-friendly infrastructure means that getting around Paris by bicycle is a dream.<br /><br />In order to use the Velib bicycles you must first purchase a pass, sold by the day for €1 or the week for €5. Passes are purchased at the Velib kiosks and require a credit or debit card with a chip in it. While many Parisians have such a card, Americans do not. (The one exception that I am aware of is American Express Blue, however you must make a special request of Amex to please issue you a card with a chip in it. And note that while Velib will accept an Amex Blue card with a chip, none of the subway or train vending machines will, so it doesn't really do you much good in France.)<br /><br />How to use your pass:<br /><br />First check the line of bicycles and select one which is in good operating condition. Flat tires, etc. are common. Don't forget which number it is. Now go to the kiosk and enter your 8 digit pass number and your 4 digit PIN code. Enter the bike number. Press more buttons agreeing to take care of the bicycle. There appear to be some bugs in the kiosk software that result in this process getting short-circuited back to the beginning, so you might have to do the whole thing two or three times.<br /><br />But, Ho! what's this we see? Some people just come up to the row of bicycles, wave a card over the locking mechanism, remove the bicycle and leave. What magic is this? How did they avoid the rather tedious process of interacting with the buggy kiosk software?<br /><br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_XEQf8MrlwEg/TL1nWeGkFmI/AAAAAAAAAiI/qjh5tiOYOQ0/s1600/navigo_card_frt-lg.jpg"><img style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 10px;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 208px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_XEQf8MrlwEg/TL1nWeGkFmI/AAAAAAAAAiI/qjh5tiOYOQ0/s320/navigo_card_frt-lg.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5529689553216214626" /></a>It is called a Navigo card. A contactless stored value smart card which is used for subways, trains, and buses. You charge it up weekly or monthly then just swipe to get through the gates at the stations. Somehow these people have tied their Navigo card to their Velib account. How did they accomplish this? Just a few...ah...simple...um..."steps":<span class="fullpost"><br /><br /><span style="font-weight:bold;">Step -6 (that is a minus sign, not punctuation for emphasis)</span>: First you must obtain a Navigo card. Spend lots of time on the Velib website and ask three friends to interpret. Is it saying that you need a Navigo to get an annual membership? And yet there is no link from the Velib.paris.fr site to the Navigo website. Yes, friends say, I need a Navigo card. Go directly to Navigo website. Finally understand that I want a regular Navigo instead of a Navigo Découverte, and make application online. Unfortunately, before I can apply I must:<br /><br /><span style="font-weight:bold;">Step -5</span> Get a permanent address. Neither Navigo nor Velib will give you anything without a permanent address, so you must find an apartment in Paris. That is a story for another blog (please provide 10 year salary and rental history in Paris for yourself and your personal financial guarantor).<br /><br /><span style="font-weight:bold;">Step -4:</span> Get a Navigo card. Website is all in purple and white. The link to actually get a card looks exactly like a graphic, and not a link at all. I need an electronic passport-style photo. Thankfully I have a camera, take the photo to the special specifications, am able to crop it and upload it. Fill out form online. Push button to send! Ten days later I receive my Navigo in the mail. Excellent! Now I can...<br /><br /><span style="font-weight:bold;">Step -3:</span> Go to the kiosk thinking that I will be able to purchase an annual Velib pass (only €29 for 1 year, I can't wait) at the same kiosks where I can purchase the daily or weekly passes. I assume that it will let me "charge up" my shiny new Navigo card with the annual pass information. No such luck. Annual Velib passes are only sold online or in some train stations (try finding one that will sell you one however, after I stood in a long line, the man behind the counter told me that they definitely did not sell Velib passes) or post offices.<br /><br /><span style="font-weight:bold;">Step -2:</span> From the Velib.paris.fr site I learn that I need a French bank account with RIB code. That Amex Blue card that I told you about before won't do you any good now. Forty-five days after first stepping into an HSBC bank in Paris, I get an RIB code and a bank card with a smart chip in it. (45 days was what it took to open the accounts, transfer lots of money, get phone calls in the middle of the night from New York office even though they know we live in Paris, get email, snail mail, phone mail codes all of which have to put together in synchronized fashion to get my very secure bank account and then, do it all over again to open one in Paris-- impossible to do it all online in 24 hours, as it would be done for a local US bank account).<br /><br />S<span style="font-weight:bold;">tep -1:</span> Get my annual Velib membership! Go to website. Link options are down the right side in descending order: "Access my account; Activate my account; Non-subscribers (pre-subscribe). So, now I will "pre-subscribe." I fill out the long form online. I have all the parts (a bank account, an address, a Navigo card number). At the end of the form it says, please print this out, sign, and mail. What's that all about? Someone is just going to have to re-enter all this information on the other end.<br /><br /><span style="font-weight:bold;">Step +1:</span> Still waiting for my annual Velib membership codes to arrive in the mail...<br /><br />Meanwhile, Velib is wonderful and I am loving riding all over Paris.</span>Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02127609476881611549noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6973565365969366405.post-64697175737644229592010-07-16T08:52:00.000-07:002010-07-16T11:50:45.402-07:00Cap & Trade Parking Permits<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_XEQf8MrlwEg/TECBZdMP-XI/AAAAAAAAAdE/RI67rQ3Uud0/s1600/trading-floor.jpg"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 216px;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_XEQf8MrlwEg/TECBZdMP-XI/AAAAAAAAAdE/RI67rQ3Uud0/s320/trading-floor.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5494533819724724594" /></a><br />Parking, like carbon and sulphur dioxide, is dramatically underpriced. And, just like CO2, the status quo is incredibly resistant to change, despite the many large environmental externalities. In Boston (and in Cambridge), residents can park for $0 (and $8) per year, while at the same time it costs as much as $3000 a year to rent off-street garage parking. One open air parking space in Boston sold for $250,000 a few years ago. That’s $2000 per square foot!<br /><br />Every time these cities (and every city) talk about raising the price of residential permits, political firestorms ensue and we end up with no change. No change means as many as one-third of the cars parked on-street aren’t driven in any given week and residents happily drive within the city instead of walking, biking or taking transit because – well, they have a car! And can park it for free!<br /><br />A friend has been thinking about this problem for years, trying to come up with a market mechanism that would fix the situation. And suddenly, my environmental brain crossed with my transportation policy brain and voila – cap & trade parking! What if:<span class="fullpost"><br /><br />Starting today, the city issues no more parking permits and those with parking permits were allowed to sell or trade them. Suddenly, the reality that those permits are worth a heck of a lot more than $8 a year is no longer contested. People who rarely drive will have to decide whether it is worth it to them to keep owning that car, or to sell the permit for wherever the market sets the price. Today in both Cambridge and Boston, parking permits allow parking only in certain specified zones. The parking permits would transfer along those same lines. In some neighborhoods, the permits would like fetch $500/year, in others, as much as $3000.<br /><br />The city could decide to buy some of these permits themselves, and retire them, reducing the number of cars residing in Cambridge, or providing them at reduced cost to new-to-the-city low income families.<br /><br />What would this plan accomplish? Two things:<br /><br />It lets permits get to market rate without politicians having to cast votes. It lets every car-owning resident participate in this new market. It gives the city a way to cap and then reduce the number of parking permits issued in the city. Permit ownership could continue to have an annual price payable to the city. The price would cover street cleaning and road repair, as well as perhaps an annual incentive to residents who don’t own a car, or to buy residents turning 16 a bicycle for their birthday. In Cambridge, a $25 annual parking permit fee would result in about $1 million a year.<br /><br />It would also reduce the number of cars parking in Cambridge, and therefore the amount of driving that gets done in Cambridge. It would or could turn Cambridge into a city of residents that would rather walk or bike for local trips (which is most of people’s trips) and provide the political demand for the bike, pedestrian, and transit infrastructure that supports this way of life.<br /><br />What do you think? I need some economists to weigh in.<br /><br /></span>Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02127609476881611549noreply@blogger.com5tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6973565365969366405.post-58497344324690392292010-07-08T13:24:00.000-07:002010-07-08T13:42:56.020-07:00Mom (age 84) Not Driving #3<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_XEQf8MrlwEg/TDY37IB-hAI/AAAAAAAAAc4/pis7oL2CwZA/s1600/shirley%27s+seating+area.jpg"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 240px;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_XEQf8MrlwEg/TDY37IB-hAI/AAAAAAAAAc4/pis7oL2CwZA/s320/shirley%27s+seating+area.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5491638284532483074" /></a><br />For the uninitiated, my mom <a href="http://networkmusings.blogspot.com/2009/04/my-mom-just-totalled-her-car.html">totaled her car</a> about a year ago, and gave it up. I've written a few updates <a href="http://networkmusings.blogspot.com/2009/05/mom-driving-update.html">(1)</a> and <a href="http://networkmusings.blogspot.com/2010/04/mom-driving-update-2.html">(2)</a> about her progress creating a new non-driving life. <br /><br />Today's email from my mom (who lives in Florida):<br /><br /><span style="font-style:italic;">I had a wonderful day...I went to my Yoga class and my yoga teacher brought me home. She said she admires me as most people would throw their arms up and say "my life is ruined as I can't drive." Instead I have met so many more people because I don't drive. <br /><br />To-night coming home from Glady's [a shut-in friend who lives 1 mile away that she visits daily by walking there and back], I met the people that restored a junk house and have not moved in yet. I had given them some sweet potato plant and they put the sod on their yard. He was working out and I went up his drive way to say hello, and he said he wife Amanda wasn't feeling well and he wanted me to go in and cheer her up. I guess she has cancer as she has no hair and had a bandana around her head. She also has two dogs that came in with me. I miss my dog so much that I gave them a lot of attention and made friends with them. Then they had a chair or two chairs in the room that has the view and I sat down and we had a fun visit. When I left the man said they go to the grocery store twice a week and would be glad to take me. I felt that I had cheered the woman up some and made friends with the dogs so it was very nice. <br /><br />And on the way up to Glady's I met two woman I already knew, one is a fireman lady and is 34 years old and the other is a 61 year old beautiful lady whose house reminds me of mine and the two of them will bike over and see me one day. Tomorrow I get a ride to church and then to a party at 7.30. The guests will come here after to see the fireworks.</span><br /><br />Bottom line: Not driving has improved her social life and happiness.<span class="fullpost"></span>Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02127609476881611549noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6973565365969366405.post-32005532835073913992010-07-05T15:31:00.000-07:002010-07-05T15:44:01.594-07:00Tapping End User Content (2.0) for Speed & ScaleIn the spring I gave a number of talks on how web 2.0 should really be talked about as 2.0 -- platforms for participation that invite and enable end-users to add their own content. Letting people tap into their own excess capacity is particularly potent because it is so low cost. And the platforms mean that this small and local content can be scaled to national and international proportions and influence. <br /><br />Quickly. <br /><br />IF you can get the platform right.<br /><br />The video is a <a href="http://www.briteconference.com/Videos/chase.aspx">4 minute edited synopsis</a> of a 20 minute talk I gave at Columbia Unviersity a number of weeks ago for their Brite conference (Brands, Innovation, Technology). I reference <a href="http://www.chatroullette.com">chatroullette</a> and <a href="http://www.couchsurfing.com">couch surfing</a>, both excellent examples of the phenomenon. <a href="http://www.350.org">350.org</a> does an excellent job of this as well. <br /><br />Related blog posts of mine:<br /><a href="http:/http://networkmusings.blogspot.com/2010/04/how-sharing-increases-innovation-part-2.html/">How Sharing Increases Innovation</a><br /><a href="http://networkmusings.blogspot.com/2010/04/thinking-about-scarcity-abundance.html">Thinking about Scarcity & Abundance</a><br /><span class="fullpost"></span>Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02127609476881611549noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6973565365969366405.post-33231952658064380312010-07-01T15:27:00.000-07:002010-07-01T16:01:25.546-07:00I want my PMV! Car-like Motorcycle-like Safe-definitely<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_XEQf8MrlwEg/TC0cih4kOkI/AAAAAAAAAcs/r8t-4HJY7dQ/s1600/1133522911_4e1101c98a.jpg"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 213px;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_XEQf8MrlwEg/TC0cih4kOkI/AAAAAAAAAcs/r8t-4HJY7dQ/s320/1133522911_4e1101c98a.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5489074900371257922" /></a><br />Here’s the question: if you currently drive a car to work and for errands, would you prefer to drive a motorcycle-carlike vehicle that is one-quarter of a car? That is, one-quarter the cost, one-quarter the fuel consumption (easily 100 miles to the gallon), requires one-quarter the space to park at one-quarter the cost of regular parking, and pay one-quarter the cost of tolls.<br /><br />OK, it’s true that its top speed might be 30 mph, with an average speed of 20 mph. But what if you could be traveling only with other lightweight vehicles traveling at similar speeds. [The average speed of cars is most cities is between 10-15 mph. In suburban areas you might be adding 5 minutes to your trip.] <br /><br />Are you saying yes? Are you focused on the one-quarter the price part? And one-quarter the space to park?<br /><br />I have this theory that lots of Americans would choose this option. <span class="fullpost">And even more if they access to a second car, owned by them or shared nearby, that they could use on the small percentage of trips where they need a bigger and faster car.<br /><br />Last week I got to ride (not drive) in one of GM’s eight EN-Vs (electric networked vehicles, pronounced “envy” – what an excellent name).[Video with the <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dg9caJZR6eM&feature=related">trend/business explanation</a>; video with the <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dg9caJZR6eM&feature=related">EN-V/people dance performance</a>]. It was enormously fun. My guess is that this vehicle will not be sold for ¼ the price of their regular cars, but some models could be. So I wondered:<br /><br />Why would people switch? Because <br /> 63% percent of all trips (and 75% of all work commute) they take are already alone in their car<br /> they would reduce the 18% of their income they spend on their car today<br /> they would not be beholden to price spikes in fossil fuels<br /> they want to find parking everywhere<br /> they want to be in the uncongested lane<br /><br />Why do people not do it today?<br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_XEQf8MrlwEg/TC0aY5T57CI/AAAAAAAAAck/Kfw6GUpZa-Y/s1600/85913556_133884f79c.jpg"><img style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 10px;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 213px;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_XEQf8MrlwEg/TC0aY5T57CI/AAAAAAAAAck/Kfw6GUpZa-Y/s320/85913556_133884f79c.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5489072535837994018" /></a><br /> Well they do, particularly in Asia<br /> Here in America none of us relish the idea of going up against truck traffic, SUVs, or regular cars<br /> Motorcycles, as we know them, are scary (for some) to drive, you get wet and cold, and they are incredibly dangerous (60 times the fatality rates of regular cars – because of speed and the going head to head with much heavier vehicles).<br /><br />Personal motorized vehicles would address an enormous number of problems associated with today’s cars: cost, congestion, pollution, CO2 emissions, parking. And I think consumer’s would choose them, based on cost, convenience, reliability, autonomy.<br /><br />The problem lies with the extreme difficulty of enabling transitions. Two suggestions to get us there:<br />1.Take some lanes or some roads and make them accessible only to light weight and low speed vehicles (bikes too could travel these lanes, and we could split current lanes in half and get as many as 4 times the vehicles (and people traveling) in the same amount of space). These lanes could be used starting today by bicycles, motorized and electric bikes and small motorcycles. Think of all the people who would buy these vehicles and switch to these lanes if we gave them a lane of traffic.<br /><br />2. Change the regulatory and safety requirements for these vehicles in line with the lesser accident risk. This would mean a lower cost to introduce new types of vehicles that meet the qualifications. And maybe even no driver’s license (!). In Europe today there are small engine electric vehicles that people can drive to get to work when their license is revoked. And in the US, we similarly don’t require licenses for small engine motorcycles.<br /><br />Are you ready? What do you think? Would you switch?<br /><br />And for the record, in dense metropolitan areas, it would still be faster to walk shorter distances, and take transit in dedicated lanes or rails, and never ever have to worry about parking.<br /><br />See here for photos of <a href="http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://blog.makezine.com/1130527037_4af2ba51a2.jpg&imgrefurl=http://blog.makezine.com/archive/2007/08/tiny_cars.html&usg=__lgV2_2T2sQ-DSoAV3PklL_OaFSI=&h=404&w=500&sz=92&hl=en&start=1&um=1&itbs=1&tbnid=18eq28VzHbik1M:&tbnh=105&tbnw=130&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dtiny%2Bcars%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26client%3Dfirefox-a%26sa%3DX%26rls%3Dorg.mozilla:en-US:official%26tbs%3Disch:1">lots of microcars</a><br />And here to take a virtual tour of the <a href="http://microcarmuseum.com/virtualtour.html">microcar museum</a>.<br /></span>Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02127609476881611549noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6973565365969366405.post-79361494593509931602010-06-09T08:07:00.000-07:002010-06-09T13:17:41.295-07:00Cars are like 2-liter Sodas<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_XEQf8MrlwEg/TA_1OvYCCgI/AAAAAAAAAbY/ksPqXauM_3E/s1600/sideways+soda.jpg"><img style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 10px;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 143px;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_XEQf8MrlwEg/TA_1OvYCCgI/AAAAAAAAAbY/ksPqXauM_3E/s320/sideways+soda.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5480868905117420034" /></a><br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_XEQf8MrlwEg/TA_1HE0UmUI/AAAAAAAAAbQ/Il3Fl8Sh974/s1600/3711852636_739c4ff57f.jpg"><img style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 10px;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 240px;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_XEQf8MrlwEg/TA_1HE0UmUI/AAAAAAAAAbQ/Il3Fl8Sh974/s320/3711852636_739c4ff57f.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5480868773434267970" /></a>Two-liter sodas are meant for parties: to be consumed by lots of people on special occasions and in a short period of time. If you buy a 2-liter soda under other conditions, you usually end up drinking too much yourself or letting some go to waste. <br /><br />Cars are like that. Despite the fact that we usually drive alone, and that we don’t drive 24, or even 12, and not even 6 hours a day, cars are only sold in the big gulp size. And so, we consume them too much in our efforts to get our money’s worth, and lots of our car’s value goes to waste.<span class="fullpost"><br /><br />Traditional carsharing lets some people consume just the amount of car they want. But small-minded documents (leases and insurance documents) make it illegal to share your own car with someone else for money, or to formally pay an individual to use their car.<br />If we want to have fewer cars in cities and towns, and fewer cars mined out of the ground, stored on our streets, and returned to landfills, we need to create the insurance and regulatory means by which this kind of just-right consumption is possible.<br /><br />Ditto for sharing car rides, for which it is also illegal in most countries to pay for the driver’s time and effort in addition to defraying some of his car costs. A California start-up Spride Ride has found a legislator who is trying to address some of these problems, but it is one state, and even that bill isn’t going far enough.<br /><br />Legislators and policy-makers around the world: realize that some people want single-sized servings of cars and rides – or maybe even the opportunity to buy a 6-pack of individual servings – but only some of us want the 2-liter bottle. And unless you think the government or big business can provide those individual car-servings in every geography and to every desiring population, you’d do best to get rid of those barriers so that some us can serve up our excess car capacity and sell it to our neighbors.<br /></span>Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02127609476881611549noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6973565365969366405.post-75822849440332793852010-05-28T00:20:00.000-07:002010-06-02T04:39:51.819-07:00The inevitability of choosing cars<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_XEQf8MrlwEg/TAZCxCRDxmI/AAAAAAAAAaI/PhEBa3NggSk/s1600/trafficJamPhoto.jpg"><img style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 10px;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 300px; height: 274px;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_XEQf8MrlwEg/TAZCxCRDxmI/AAAAAAAAAaI/PhEBa3NggSk/s320/trafficJamPhoto.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5478139406932231778" /></a><br /><br />Infrastructure is destiny. And our insurance, safety, and legal systems, as well as our land and road use requirements are the infrastructure that that pushes us inevitably towards cars. <br /><br />When we need to travel, most people in most countries have three transportation choices before them:<br /><br /><span style="font-weight:bold;">1. Walk or bike in unsafe conditions<br />2. Take mass transit that is infrequent, low quality, unreliable, and not point to point<br />3. Own their own car that delivers on demand, safe, and point to point travel</span><span class="fullpost"><br /> •These cars must be owned and driven by one person or household; sharing cars or rides for money is not legally allowed nor supported by the insurance industry.<br /> •Commercial and residential real estate developments require accommodation for cars but not for other forms of transportation, and these car accommodations are almost always mandatory, not optional.<br /><br />Is it any wonder that as soon as people can afford one or are old enough to drive one, the car is the mode selected? This is as true in Delhi as it is in Detroit. Some countries are better than others – the Dutch and Danish for example.<br /><br />What can be done?<br /><br /><span style="font-weight:bold;">1.Make sure that there are safe walking and biking possibilities.</span> I would further encourage the development of roads that are restricted to low speed and low weight vehicles. We accommodate not only feet and bicycles, but any vehicle that is relatively clean, slow, and light weight – with minimal safety requirements or licensing necessary. It doesn’t make sense that New York City will allow bicycles and pedicabs to use certain streets, but not lightweight and non-polluting CNG auto rickshaws that travel at similar speeds. We would see a boom of innovation and creative vehicles that can deliver more safe, convenient, point to point and personal travel options for this category of roads. <br /><span style="font-weight:bold;"><br /><br />2. Redefine mass transit.</span> In rich countries today, we have drawn very hard lines between personal and commercial vehicles, with the result that willing people with their own cars can not fill mass transport gaps in exchange for money. Typically this is illegal and our insurance systems won’t support it. I can’t formally pay you $5 to pick up my mom and take her somewhere – even if you are going there yourself. I can’t let you drive my car in exchange for money. Once money is involved – and why shouldn’t it be? – current laws define this endeavor as a commercial one and apply significant safety and legal structures that just don’t make sense. If we want to see more innovation in the transportation sector; if we want to enable more people to satisfy their needs without owning a car, we must let small scale efforts flourish. Once a “small” business becomes a large one, we can apply safety and licensing laws that make sense for large volumes where risk is magnified. At small volumes, these rules are overkill.<br /><br /><span style="font-weight:bold;">3.Change the rules</span> (insurance, licensing, parking) that assume one owner/one adult/one building unit/one car. We need to make sure that people can buy, or rent, or consume fractions of cars and parking spaces. If we don’t change these rules, we are forced to buy, consume, and park whole cars, whether or not that is what we want.<br /><br /></span>Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02127609476881611549noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6973565365969366405.post-17495351995249922442010-05-17T15:46:00.000-07:002010-05-17T16:01:26.472-07:00Brilliant Strategy for Transition to Road User Fees<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_XEQf8MrlwEg/S_HJQgCLJsI/AAAAAAAAAY4/sQl5BMWka34/s1600/new-nice-electric-car.jpg"><img style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 10px;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 240px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_XEQf8MrlwEg/S_HJQgCLJsI/AAAAAAAAAY4/sQl5BMWka34/s320/new-nice-electric-car.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5472376307546007234" /></a>Everybody in transportation knows that we need to move from a gas tax to a road user fee in order to finance transportation infrastructure. Regular people – that is, everybody else – hate this idea and doesn’t get it. A colleague has come up with what I think is a genius political approach that I describe in the second half of this post. The first half describes the problem.<span class="fullpost"><br /><span style="font-weight:bold;"><br />THE PROBLEM.</span> This is what the public says: <br /><br /><span style="font-weight:bold;">I’m already paying for the roads through my taxes.</span> [Actually, you are paying with 18 year old prices since the fuel tax hasn’t been changed in that long. In the meantime, the costs have increased enormously. And compared to the price and volatility of the gas itself, the taxes are not that significant a percentage. ]<br /><br /><span style="font-weight:bold;">It works great. Why touch it? If the amount of money raised is the problem, just raise the tax. </span>[Well, 1) you can’t just raise the tax, which is why it hasn’t happened in 18 years even though we are experiencing a crisis in our transportation infrastructure which is crumbling and ancient. If you’re lucky enough to do any traveling to Europe, you’ll note that our airports, train stations, trains, roads, and sidewalks are so much worse than what you see there. We are looking like the poor, ragged cousin. And if the fuel tax is broken as a means of raising money, as we move to more fuel efficient vehicles and alternative fuels, it will get increasingly broken.]<br /><br /><span style="font-weight:bold;">Paying by the mile is an unfair and regressive as a tax. What about the miles I drive out of state or on private roads? What about poor people? </span>[Today’s gas tax has all those same problems. Some of the road user fee implementations could correct some of those problems.]<br /><br /><span style="font-weight:bold;">What about my privacy? I don’t want the government to know my every move. </span>[Good point, <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robin-chase/national-dialogue-on-loca_b_179106.html">read this</a> that I wrote earlier]<br /><br /><span style="font-weight:bold;">THE SOLUTION.</span> Here is a strategy that can get political buy-in and offer us a transitional path toward adopting road user fees. I’m thinking it is pretty clever and viable.<br />Put together a working group of legislators and outside stakeholders to discuss how we pro-actively address the impending transition to electric vehicles. Here is how the logic can proceed:<br /><br />1. Everyone is willing to agree that EVs should pay their fair share, and that the gas tax system let's them off the hook.<br /><br />2. It is far better to pro-actively come up with an appropriate solution before there are lots of them. With the tax expectation in place, people can buy EVs with full knowledge, rather than government trying to change the rules after this has become a significant market with a significant constituency.<br /><br />3. The bill itself should be lightly worded. Owners of electric vehicles need to pay for miles driven within the state according to some referred-to rate plan (which definitely needs to adjust with inflation). The simplest means would be an odometer reading at time of inspection. Other mechanisms that result in the appropriate payment, as approved by the state, would also be allowed.<br /><br />4. To be fair, any driver/vehicle can choose to opt in to this new method of road user fees, instead of paying gas taxes.<br /><span style="font-weight:bold;"><br />Implications:</span> We have a platform for experimentation on this new payment method, and working it through the entire system with low volumes. We start with the lowest common denominator for payment (odometer reading) that side steps privacy and technology concerns. However, other technology solutions could come online and be approved by the state (payment with GPS using smart phones, or with other in-vehicle devices – those built in to the car or those retrofitted on existing vehicles). Having multiple payment options will ultimately provide consumers with an array of choices that many people will find more appealing. Some solutions will address the privacy issues. Some will be able to track out-of-state versus in-state miles. Just about every other option could be a preferred choice over the crude odometer reading because it will reduce the distance taxed. As time goes on, there would likely be all sorts of methods for payment and collecting of the data that use a wide range of devices, evolve over time, and take the burden of devices and refreshing them away from the state.<br /><br />That is the gist. I think it is a brilliant strategy that should have few detractors now, gives a slow easy opportunity for working the new payment mechanism through the collections systems, and opens up the path for any kind of vehicle, to opt into the system.<br /></span>Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02127609476881611549noreply@blogger.com3